What’s the Secret Word ?

                    

And now for the ER…East Georgia Regional, or should I say:  “Are you a good nurse or a bad nurse?” PART I:  some of the names were changed to protect the innocent.

Let me begin by stating that people either earn my respect or go away empty handed.

This blog is inspired by a recent ER experience. Everyone dreads the ER.

My husband landed in the ER while I was out of town.  He is okay now.  The story, however, is worth telling. 

After spending hours on the phone, that is to say every ½ hour to 45 minutes making calls to the ER to find out what his results were, and if he was to be admitted or not, I was still somewhat puzzled.

Luckily, I’d been given let’s call him “Waldo” (or maybe it was Walt) to discuss his case.  As soon as I’d call and Waldo knew something he offered me the specifics related to the various tests given.  For example, blood work came back first and he gave me results without me even asking for them.  God bless him.

Waldo then became busy with another patient.  I was directed to let’s call her “Plight” who was supposedly hubby’s nurse of the moment. Waldo was just kind enough to take calls between patients.  Bravo!

Plight, (as close as I can come to the name Blythe), is another story.

As soon as I got on the phone with her, I knew I had the better one in Waldo.  Nonetheless, I was still trying to gather information on my husband’s case—-which I was encouraged to do via secretary and Waldo (the previous nurse).

I began explaining to Plight that I was told she was my husband’s nurse and I wanted to know if, finally, the CATSCAN results were in. 

Rather than give reassurance like the other two, this one argued with me.  And, if you’ve been following my blog long enough, you’ll know that arguing with me is not the way to impress me. My husband likes to say that I am a very nice person, but you don’t want to give me a reason to get into a tit for tat with me.  I always win.

Plight quipped that she did not have the results, but even if she did, she could not tell me anything over the phone. I told her that no one I’d spoken to all day had dared to say that I could not be informed as to my husband’s progress.  She went on to defend herself by saying it was the law.

Nothing ever impresses me less.

So I said if I knew the T-cell count already…she said that would be breaking the law.  OOPS!

So, you’ve guessed the good nurse vs. bad nurse.

Luckily a shift change was about to take place and she would no longer be around.  I told her on her way out the door that this was no way to speak to people under stress whose loved one was in the ER and that, furthermore, she was a very unimpressive individual. 

She tried to back peddle her way out by saying that once my husband was admitted he could tell me himself.  Well, I said with the drugs they were about to give him, it’s hard to say what he’ll be able to tell me.  Not to mention that a patient should not be bothered while resting and trying to recuperate. She was now changing her story, complete with ifs ands or buts. That’s a sign of bad communication skills.

Then she insisted if I were present, she/they could tell me.  Wouldn’t you think the ER was crowded enough (no wonder). 

I told her she needed to improve her communication skills and that all options should be available to ease the patient’s and family’s concerns. I refrained from using multiple expletives.  Although I was certainly tempted to do so, I remained a lady. And, I added that whether she knew it or not, some people travel in their work.  We can’t always be in the same room, let alone the same time zone or even the same country with our spouses or other loved ones. 

The secretary upon hearing I was out of town said appropriately:  “Bless your heart.”

I told her in all honesty what I thought of the two nurses and that I was glad Plight, a fitting nickname for Blythe, would no longer be “caring for” my husband. She made no arguments but simply chuckled knowingly.

People should be fired for the kind of insolence such nurses or doctors display.  Either fire them or give them serious sensitivity training.

I ended by telling Nurse Plight that I was going to stay calm for my sake and for my husband’s sake but that she needed a good scolding.  She needed to make note of it as a scolding for future reference so that she would forever remember it that way.

BTW, I got results from the next nurse with no struggle at all.  She mentioned that the staff told her I’d been calling all day and to give me whatever I wanted. 

Are you a good nurse or a bad nurse?  PART II: 

Once he was admitted and evaluations were on-going, I had several more conversations with my husband and the new nurse.  She made no mention of not being allowed to share info with me, so I thought the matter was resolved.  Mary was charming and deserves high praise.

After her shift ended, the nightmare continued. My husband made a call to me wanting to know if anyone had informed me about new developments.  No one had.  He explained he’d been given pain meds and things were moving in the right direction but no indication was given as to his release from hospital.  We were not out of the woods yet.

I wanted him to get the rest he needed and I could tell it was hard for him to speak, so I told him I’d be calling the nurse’s station for more info.  I was immediately greeted with the hard-line response that I needed a “code” to get info from “them.”  Stacy, the new nurse, stated that it was the ‘law.’

I informed her that everyone else had been giving me info after he was admitted.  I did not even know what she meant by a “code.”

She said patients get a code as they are admitted, if they so choose, and then they tell the loved one the code so that the loved one can, in turn, tell the hospital staff.

If medicine wasn’t such serious business, I’d say this was something like a comedy of errors or a running gag along the lines of:  “Who’s on first; What’s on second; I don’t know’s on third.”

I said I had not been given such a code by my husband possibly because he was given drugs and he simply forgot. Or, perhaps, the admissions process was faulty and they neglected to complete the forms correctly.  If a code is so all fired important to some of the lesser staff then they need to get their ducks in a row.  Speaking of ducks, doesn’t it remind you of the old Groucho Marx game show involving the secret word? 

She argued that the patient had to provide the code.  I stated the obvious (obvious to all of us but not to some of them) that the patient would not know a code was required unless they asked for one.

Who walks into the hospital carrying along with them a secret code, let alone who comes through the ER by ambulance, as my husband did, with a code in mind.

As she was not coming up with a solution (to a problem of her own making, which was not a problem in my mind), I told her to go to my husband and ask him to give her a code for me that I could give back to her.  She was not happy to do it—-but she did it anyway at my insistence.  I owe her reluctance more to a lazy attitude rather than a response to my sarcasm, which such people are usually not smart enough to understand. 

Naturally, she came back to the phone saying that he did not have a code but to give me anything I wanted.  I believe her exact words were:  “Your husband told me it was okay to talk to you.”  I chuckled and said:  “Of course, he did.”  (BTW, even in his weakened state, my hubby worked in a little sarcasm of his own.)  

Given all of this, my evaluation of East Georgia Regional is mixed.  Half of the nursing staff I encountered turned out to be useless. Thank goodness our situation turned out okay.  Hard to imagine what it’s like to deal with such staff when that is not the case.

My heart goes out to them.

The moral of the story is:

For those in service to others, who know their duty is to serve, we give due credit.

For those in service to others, who do not know their duty is to serve, we put them in their place.

Suck folks exist in all strata of society and such situations play out in terms of customer service.

In part, I like to think I play a role in helping them to do a better job whenever warranted.

After all, every girl should have a hobby.

 

Au revoir les imbéciles!

Since I left my previous doctor, I have not returned to the office called Statesboro Family Practice.

My husband, who has a different doctor in that group, plans on leaving, too.

In the meantime, since he has a different doctor from mine there, he’s been going through the motions of annual physical to get refills on meds, etc.

We’ve been asking friends and colleagues as well as other physicians we know, specifically specialists who are friends, for referrals.

Life got busy and before we had the chance to establish ourselves with a new office, my husband developed symptoms of a kidney stone.

He began drinking water to flush it out.  Before too long, he realized things were getting worse rather than better.  He called his doctor’s office, but his doctor was out that day.  When he arrived at the appointment with the nurse practitioner, he was able to explain that he’d been drinking lots of water to flush out the kidney stone.

More personnel got involved—-unfortunately among them my previous doctor.  She (the only woman physician there) always manages to jump to the wrong conclusions.  And, she thinks she can never be wrong.  You know the type.

In retrospect, he wishes he’d bypassed the group and gone straight to ER.  Once a doctor there saw him, he confirmed that there was a kidney stone with added complications of too much water wiping out his electrolytes causing fainting and loss of speech, etc.

The Statesboro Family Practice was ready to dismiss the kidney stone explanation.  They did not listen to the patient.  The call that was made to me from there was not reassuring in any way.  They cast great doubt on the situation—-jumping to the worst possible conclusions. 

Even though I understood there was urgency, I remained calm and said:  “But, it could still be a kidney stone.”

I was right.  Statesboro Family practice was wrong—-specifically my previous doctor.

Are You a Good Witch or a Bad Witch?

It all depends.  Allow me to explain.

If you are perceived as the evil, wicked one in the mind of a narcissist, then it is more than likely you are a whistle blower.  Nothing bothers a narcissist more than to be seen for what they are by others.  If you are the one who not only sees them for what they are but also reports on them for what they do wrong, then you are an evil, wicked one (to them).

Narcissists are famously known for placing the blame on others, especially when they are challenged by a whistle blower.  They could not possibly ever do wrong, so how could you ever dream of challenging them or their motivations (which, by the way, are always unselfish).  Blind as they are to their own faults, they divert the negative attention onto the whistle blower.  We don’t have to look far to find examples in politics of cover-ups and the finger pointing contests that take place in such circles.

It happens in average families and in the everyday workplace just as often as it does among political figures andHollywoodcharacters.  Famous rants are caught on tape and played out for the world to hear, often providing more entertainment value than the so-called artists’ on-screen performances. 

So ask yourself the question:  Am I a good witch or a bad witch?

As for me, I am a whistle blower.  Just like the Good Witch in The Wizard of Oz, I laugh at the efforts of those I know are narcissists and repeat the immortal lines:  “You have no power here.  Be gone before somebody drops a house on you, too.”

                     

Apron Strings

It’s becoming fashionable again that women at home wear decorative forties and fifties style aprons.  I find this trend interesting in light of certain rhetoric and with so many social and economic changes taking place.

I was given such an apron as a child.  It was a gift from a neighbor and she had embroidered my name on the apron.  I used to like to wear it and sometimes would take it out of the drawer just to admire it.

Looking back on that memory, I realize that no one meant any harm by giving me such a wardrobe piece.  I also realize that it sent a message to the wearer.  These were popular items at the time and our mothers wanted us to emulate them in their roles.

Such aprons are very pretty.  There’s nothing wrong with femininity.  There is a problem when the strings are so tight that they limit the girl to what has always been considered a traditional role.

I can’t help but think of movie lines from Mona Lisa Smile like:  “A girdle to set you free.  What does that mean!?”

The message of that movie, in which women were depicted wearing such aprons in advertisements (as in real life), was that women could:  “bake their cake and eat it, too.”

                              

Girls and Shades of Blue (not grey)

Some might say that feminism has brought on changes in family values—-of women waiting longer to marry or even of women not wanting to marry at all.  Others might say that feminism is to blame for the “ills” of society—-if not marrying until one is older can indeed be considered an ill.

I do not agree that feminism can be held in such a light.  Freedom to choose a partner when or if a person is ready to marry must certainly be a virtue.  No one wants to go back to a time (or revert to a culture) of arranged marriage, or do they?

Now, for those new shows on HBO, what are we to do?  The newest one to broach the topic of young women gone wild in the city is called simply:  GIRLS.

It is being compared to another famous girl-centered sitcom:  Sex and the City (although in this case the girls portrayed in it appear younger and far less glamorous).

The questions concerning the latest entry into the world of girl-centered sitcoms focus on the idea of self-esteem and sexuality.  Are the “girls” only conforming to male expectations (girls here are about 25 or so years old).  And, does this not reflect another tendency of women to conform to the expectations of society (a society transformed—-no longer one of virtue that is family centered but rather one of promiscuity that is still, nonetheless, male dominated)?

I actually don’t think it’s that deep.  I think it’s just as simple as that old saying:  “Sex sells.”  And, so the shades of grey come into play.

As to whether or not certain works are demeaning to women or send the wrong message, that’s up to the viewer or reader to decide.  I believe this trend is, in fact, unabashedly the mainstreaming of what may be considered hardcore pornography.

And check out my new fragrance, NARCISSIST - give the gift of self-love.

Happy Mother’s Day

“Every mother works hard and deserves respect.”  I believe that’s the quote from Michelle Obama concerning recent controversy surrounding Ann Romney.

So, what if you’re not a mother or a father for that matter?

I believe we should focus not so much on motherhood or fatherhood but rather on personhood (and include men, too).

Let’s change her quote to:  “Every person works hard and deserves respect.”

After all, is everyone destined to be a parent?  Do women and men not deserve respect until or unless they have children?  Do they deserve extra respect once they do have children? 

I say no.  I know Gloria Steinem would agree.  She was all about personhood. I’d add that not everyone should become a parent.

BTW, Ann Romney did not work hard raising five boys given her means.

Unfortunately, I think the current conversation has limited women to two possible roles.  It’s not as though we have only two camps of women in the U.S.—-both married and both with children with the only difference being work outside the home vs. stay at home moms.

We have so many other scenarios.

The first to come to mind is single moms.  It stands to reason that these women probably cannot choose to stay at home.  Who would support their children? Who supports them if the father is derelict and the mom does not work—-the system—-which leads us back to personal responsibility.

How women become single moms should not enter the equation.  Some are by choice, others by circumstance of divorce, etc.  My mom stayed at home.  Her only sister, my godmother, was divorced after having four children and worked as a teacher to support them.  She also received child support and alimony from the father.

Between my mom and my aunt, neither scenario seems more worthy to me of congratulations.

The buzz surrounding the latest comment concerning Ann Romney is “extra terrestrial” at best.

Most women with children do not live like she does period.  Most people, whether they have children or not, live within a much stricter budget than the Romneys.

She should not be congratulated for having children.  Nor should she be congratulated for choosing not to work to raise them.

The now famous remark made by Hillary Rosen was simply meant to point out that—-given her extraordinary financial means—-she did not need to go out to work to help pay the bills, so how could she possibly understand economic struggles.

If she did not have children, she would still not have had to get a job to pay the bills.

Her motherhood has nothing to do with it.

And please take a moment to check out my new fragrance:  NARCISSIST

Savannah Author Starts Product Line - Offers New Fragrance for Men

Transforming words into scents, author and linguist Kimberly A. Taylor starts a new Savannah, Georgia based business offering fine fragrances themed around her writing.

If she had to choose a favorite flower, it would surely be one that grows in France. A climbing vine, one that clings to the rock and ascends hilltop “perch” villages in southern Provence and the Côte d’Azur, perhaps it is one of the many varieties of Bougainvilleas that thrive in such conditions.

Nestled among them, perched high above the Mediterranean Sea is a place called Eze. From that vantage point, you can see forever. It is not only known for its magnificent views but also for its parfums. 

This is a place she discovered early in her life. When she dreams of that place, she dreams of it in all its splendor, colors and scents. When she dreams of it, she dreams in French.

For Kimberly A. Taylor, a former professor of languages and marketing, sound is still her driving force. Her journey has taken her through many foreign places. Long before her life in Slovakia, the main focus of her recently published book: Play Fair! The Art of Relationship and Friendship, she lived and worked in France.

From impression management to communication styles, the language of relationships is what it’s all about. Ethics or truth, if you prefer, underlies the message. Her style is straight forward and honest. Interwoven with personal anecdotes, it’s smart, funny and thought-provoking.

Her fluency in French opened the way for new adventures and brought her home again.

True to her philosophy of life, her sense of humor and irony shine through in her new fragrance: NARCISSIST.


                        

Who’s Your Prophet?

It’s not about any one politician’s struggles (or any politician’s wife’s lifestyle).  It’s about the economy.  

Whatever Ann Romney’s personal struggles might be…especially in terms of her health…unlike many Americans today, we know that one of them is not how to afford anything (including health care).

Let’s face it, their prophet was not in touch with reality either.

Erasmus of Rotterdam: Brilliant Satirist

Praise of Folly, Erasmus’s best known work, was written in 1509 and published around 1511, when he was 42 or 45, to amuse Thomas More (while staying with him over a period of one week).

Erasmus was in opposition to the scholastics—-who saw themselves as defenders of a traditional orthodoxy.  He was a monk, adamantly opposed to their view and to the justification of obtaining recantations from “heretics” by the use of physical torture.  (Heinrich Kramer, author of the infamous Malleus Maleficarum (1486), was responsible for inventing new forms of torture for this very reason.)

By the early 1500’s a new age was dawning, an age of humanists and of those who admired them.  The Renaissance had allowed Erasmus approval of kings and popes alike:  Henry VIII (England), Pope Leo X, Charles V (Spain), as well as Francois I (France), and Ferdinand of Austria.

Lucky for Erasmus, the times they were a’ changing.  What’s that old saying: The more things change, the more they stay the same.  Or, there’s another one I remember from childhood:  There’s nothing new under the sun.

I recently posted one of my favorite Erasmus quotes:  “The worst always pleases the most people, since the majority of men, as I said before, are prone to folly.”

Erasmus goes on to say:  “Besides, if an artist is all the more pleased with himself and the more generally admired the less skilled he is, why should he choose to undergo a proper course of instruction?  It’ll cost him a lot in the first place, then make him more nervous and self-conscious, and he’ll end up pleasing far fewer people.”

I could apply this to countless modern day examples.  It’s like the author reaches out across the ages to a time of reality TV and other tasteless “art” forms.  His comments are as true today as they were in his day. 

The latest scam artist to hit the media (at least that I’ve heard about) is a self-professed exorcist, who has engaged his home-schooled daughter along with two of her friends in his business.  Their performances of exorcisms are a possible platform for a new reality TV show.  The girls who work with the pastor are between the ages of 17 and 20. 

It all sounds medieval to me.

                                               

Three Empty Cups of Tea

This story should be a lesson for all.  Most of the truly charitable folks in the world manage to give to the needy without bringing glory to themselves, let alone take money from the organization(s) they might represent or oversee.

For some reason, this story seems apropos for the Good Friday/Passover-Easter weekend.

The Three Cups of Tea author must repay $1 million to charitable organization CAI.

http://www.npr.org/2012/04/06/150107334/three-cups-of-tea-author-to-repay-charity